Aeronautical Decision-Making

Automation is the single most important advance in aviation important to remember to check and confirm calculations. technologies. Electronic flight displays (EFDs) have made Always remember that it is up to the pilot to maintain basic vast improvements in how information is displayed and airmanship skills and use those skills often to maintain what information is available to the pilot. Pilots can access proficiency in all tasks. electronic databases that contain all of the information traditionally contained in multiple handbooks, reducing Although automation has made flying safer, automated clutter in the flight deck. [Figure 2-21] systems can make some errors more evident and sometimes hide other errors or make them less evident. There are MFDs are capable of displaying moving maps that mirror concerns about the effect of automation on pilots. In a study sectional charts. These detailed displays depict all airspace, published in 1995, the British Airline Pilots Association including Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs). MFDs are officially voiced its concern that “Airline pilots increasingly so descriptive that many pilots fall into the trap of relying lack ‘basic flying skills’ as a result of reliance on automation.” solely on the moving maps for navigation. Pilots also draw upon the database to familiarize themselves with departure This reliance on automation translates into a lack of basic flying and destination airport information. skills that may affect the pilot’s ability to cope with an in-flight emergency, such as sudden mechanical failure. The worry that More pilots now rely on electronic databases for flight pilots are becoming too reliant on automated systems and are planning and use automated flight planning tools rather not being encouraged or trained to fly manually has grown than planning the flight by the traditional methods of laying with the increase in the number of MFD flight decks. out charts, drawing the course, identifying navigation points (assuming a VFR flight), and using the POH to As automated flight decks began entering everyday line figure out the weight and balance and performance charts. operations, instructors and check airmen grew concerned Whichever method a pilot chooses to plan a flight, it is about some of the unanticipated side effects. Despite the promise of reducing human mistakes, the flight managers reported the automation actually created much larger errors at times. In the terminal environment, the workload in an automated flight deck actually seemed higher than in the older analog flight decks. At other times, the automation seemed to lull the flight crews into complacency. Over time, concern surfaced that the manual flying skills of the automated flight crews deteriorated due to over-reliance on computers. The flight crew managers said they worried that pilots would have less “stick-and-rudder” proficiency when those skills were needed to manually resume direct control of the aircraft. A major study was conducted to evaluate the performance of two groups of pilots. The control group was composed of pilots who flew an older version of a common twin-jet airliner equipped with analog instrumentation and the experimental group was composed of pilots who flew the same aircraft, but newer models equipped with an electronic flight instrument system (EFIS) and a flight management system (FMS). The pilots were evaluated in maintaining aircraft parameters, such as heading, altitude, airspeed, glideslope, and localizer deviations, as well as pilot control inputs. These were recorded during a variety of normal, abnormal, and emergency maneuvers during 4 hours of simulator sessions. Figure 2-21. Electronic flight instrumentation comes in many systems and provides a myriad of information to the pilot. 2-26